You are here
A Year of Real-World Design
Centered on collaboration with Duke Medicine clinicians, Duke BME's re-imagined design course challenges students to design solutions to real patients' problems
By Michaela Kane
Every engineer knows that the design process is not a straightforward one. For Emelina Vienneau, Diana Arguijo, Sarah Jacobs and Kayla Wright-Freeman, the serpentine route to a finished product was fresh in their minds as they presented their final senior design project, “A Breath of Fresh Air,” during the Spring 2018 Duke BME Design Symposium. These biomedical engineering students had spent the better part of a year creating a respiratory muscle training (RMT) device before scrapping their initial design for a new one—less than a month before their final presenations.
“We had been working on this project throughout the fall and spring semesters, but it felt like it wasn’t coming together in the way we envisioned,” says Vienneau. “We had this nagging sense that our initial approach wasn’t solving the right problem for Harrison Jones, our clinical partner, or for the patients, so we decided to start over.”
Typically, when people have weak respiratory muscles—common in conditions such as Pompe disease or COPD—physicians prescribe respiratory therapy that trains their lungs as they inhale and exhale against resistance, just as someone would lift weights to gain strength. Traditional RMT devices include a tube containing a spring-loaded threshold valve, which determines the air resistance. Patients inhale or exhale into the tube, using their lungs to create a pressure differential. Once the pressure meets the designated threshold, air will move through the tube and patients will have ‘exercised’ their respiratory muscles.
But current RMT devices have drawbacks. Most use unidirectional valves, so patients need two separate devices to strengthen their inspiratory and expiratory muscles. The range of the spring-loaded valves is also limited, so the devices don’t always offer the resistance levels patients require.
The team’s final design was specifically created to address these shortcomings. 3D-printed in bright pink filament, their RMT device boasts a single breathing tube containing a bidirectional motorized butterfly valve. The air tube also incorporates a differential pressure sensor that measures the flow rate within the tube to indicate a successful or unsuccessful breath.
“We created this brand-new tool in a month, and it is unlike anything that’s currently on the market,” says Vienneau. “The motorized butter-fly valve allowed us to use a single air tube, fully automate the device, and create a full range of re-sistances. The prototype was well-received by our professors and our clinical partner. In the end, we were really glad we scrapped the first design and started again, because we made a better product that solved the problem at hand in a more elegant way.”
Understanding Doctors' Dilemmas
The Fresh Air team was among the first to pilot a new two-semester design program offered by Duke’s Department of Biomedical Engineering. Spearheaded by Mark Palmeri, a physician-engineer and professor of the practice in BME, the program offers an immersive design curriculum that challenges students to solve the real-world problems physicians encounter in medicine.
“When I became chair of BME, I realized that our design curriculum and course offerings needed to be revamped,” says Ashutosh Chilkoti. “Our design course was one semester long, which is too short to traverse the path from identifying a clinical need to designing a prototype device that addresses that need. I quickly realized that Mark—with his background as a designer of ultrasound instrumentation, and his dual MD/PhD degree—was the person who could design and pilot a new two-semester design course.”
The next step in the development of the new program took root when Palmeri and Chilkoti attended a 2016 lunch discussion with Duke neonatologists who talked about the technological gaps they experienced in their work. Within a year, Palmeri had organized a two-semester pilot program with master’s students focused on medical devices for neonatology. By the end of 2017, students had created projects including a modified stethoscope that could monitor cardiac abnormalities, a biometrics recording device that could track infant respiration and heart rate and send the information to a doctor’s phone, and a handheld scanner that used ultrasonic waves to examine bone density.
“We weren’t able to test these devices in the neo-natal population during that pilot year, but the students were able to create successful products that can continue to be developed,” says Palmeri. “After seeing what they produced, I bought heavily into the idea of year-long design courses being highly beneficial for students, and it felt like a natural direction in which to grow our design curriculum.”
Design Moves Downtown
Finding space for the new curriculum was the final challenge.
"We wanted to create a space that served the needs of instructors and was a place that students were happy to work in," says Chilkoti. The team turned to the Chesterfield Building in downtown Durham, with shuttle service to and from Duke. Working with Marcus Henderson and Matt Brown, Duke BME’s laboratory instructors, the team created a customized design suite that would serve the needs for an immersive two-semester senior design course.
“This was exciting for all of us, because we had taught students in retrofitted spaces for years. Now, following our inputs, architects had created a beautiful new lab expressly for teaching electronics and electronic design,” says Henderson.
In the fall of 2017, Duke BME officially launched the two-semester design program for undergraduate students in the customized design suite.
With Palmeri at the helm as the instructor and Brown spending much of his time at Chesterfield lending technical support, all the pieces for a new two-semester design experience were in place. Students first enroll in BME 590: Fundamentals of Design, where they choose a project and begin to collaborate with a physician to assess the needs and shadow them at Duke University Medical Center. The following spring, students take BME 464: Medical Device Design to begin the actual construction of their projects.
To expand the pool of clinicians students could work with, Palmeri partnered with Duke MEDx, an interdisciplinary initiative between the Pratt School of Engineering and the Duke University School of Medicine. “Our goal was to ensure that the student design teams had authentic problems to sink their teeth into, rather than something that felt like an academic exercise. If they are going to work on something for a year, we want them to be invested in it and feel like it will have a greater use,” says Palmeri. “We also wanted to leverage Duke BME’s physical proximity to the Medical Center to be able to give them that hands-on experience in a variety of different fields.”
Devices Across Disciplines
Palmeri’s inaugural crop of design students spread across six projects and multiple disciplines. In the field of urology, one team created a device to help manage Vescicoureteral Reflux (VUR), the retrograde flow of urine from the bladder to the kidney. By creating a pressure transducer catheter, the team was able to measure the pressure changes at the bladder wall and calculate the length of the intramural ureter, helping surgeons more accurately estimate the amount of bulking agent needed to manage symptoms.
Working with anesthesiologists, a group of students attempted to create an accurate and easy-to-use neuromuscular paralysis monitor to track the muscle relaxation of patients under general anesthesia. A second group sought to help anesthesiologists visualize the throat while inserting a breathing tube, creating a 3D-printed cage that encompassed a tiny camera.
Another team worked with a laparoscopic surgeon to create a tool that would locate needles lost in a patient’s abdomen—a rare problem, but one that can cause severe complications if not quickly addressed. Physicians typically use intraoperative X-ray to search for lost needles, but the students designed a wand-like device equipped with a metal detection circuit to do the job more quickly.
“I think we’re in a unique position in that we can use our expanded design course to address clinical areas that have been neglected by the heavy hitters in industry,” says Palmeri. “We are constantly seeing advances in fields like cardiology, but I think we can make strides in neglected fields like respiratory therapy or neonatology, especially if we can give them long-term, personalized attention.”
And patients aren’t the only ones who will benefit—three of Palmeri’s students worked with gastroenterologist Darin Dufault to help physicians themselves. Doctors who perform numerous endoscopies, it turns out, often experience musculoskeletal injuries during their careers due to the repetitive motions required by the work.
“I graduated from medical school in the last 10 years, and I’ve already seen classmates who are scaling back their practice because of repetitive motion injuries or arthritis,” says Palmeri. “This endoscopy project was actually based on lots of anecdotal evidence from physicians about their discomfort, but there was never an effort to see how the ergonomics of these tools could be improved.”
By creating different sizes of dials, the students were able to make the endoscope more comfortable to hold and reduced the repetitive motions physicians would need to make with their hands and fingers, limiting their joint pain.
“Through observation, feedback and numerous prototype iterations, we were able to develop a simple device that not only allows doctors with all sizes of hands to use safely and efficiently, but alleviates strain in the hand and maintains increased operator safety, even after a long day of procedures,” says Hannah Grossman, one of the students from the team. "No we've got a viable product with applications that extend beyond our initial intentions—and that is something the team is proud of."
From Classroom to Commercialization
Just a year into the design program, student interest is exceeding expectations.
“When we opened the first course for students to sign up, it filled up in less than a minute and the wait-list was two to three times the course capacity. We had to turn students away,” says Palmeri. “It’s always positive to see that the student interest is there, now we just have to grow so we can get rid of that bottleneck and give students the comprehensive design experience they clearly want.”
There are already plans to do just that. BME's Kevin Caves and Robert Malkin have already expanded their design courses into two-semester programs, and new faculty member Eric Richardson will teach his own section of the course. Palmeri will also expand the projects students can work on in his own course, with plans to bring back some of the neonatology devices from the pilot program and introduce more collaborations with MEDx partners.
"When students graduate and go on to jobs, it's programs like this that allow them to hit the ground running."
The program has also captured the interest of Robin Rasor, the executive director of Duke University’s Office for Licensing and Ventures. After learning about the ergonomic endoscope project, Rasor met with the team and gave them advice about how they could commercialize their design for widespread use. Duke OLV also filed a patent application to protect their technology, as well as for the respiratory device developed by Vienneau and her team.
“I was really impressed to see how much these students were able to accomplish in just two semesters,” says Rasor. “The fact that Duke OLV was interested in pursuing, protecting and marketing two projects within the first year of the program’s creation really speaks to both the strength of the program and the skills of the students in it.”
Just as planned, the students grow through the course as well. “The two-semester design program was one of my most rewarding experiences at Duke,” says Vienneau. “It was unique to have the chance to build something that was clinically relevant and provides a valuable service. That’s why so many of us choose biomedical engineering to begin with.”
For Palmeri, seeing his students’ success confirms the need for more immersive design programs that can prepare graduating students for jobs in industry.
“The ability to bring a design to life is a ubiquitous skillset, and we want to provide more opportunities for students to use the skills they’ve developed at Duke to solve real problems,” he says. “When students graduate and go on to jobs, it’s programs like this that allow them to hit the ground running.”